President Trump joined congressional Republicans in publicly rejecting the Ukraine call whistleblower‘s offer to react to composed queries from Republican lawmakers, as an alternative insisting that he or she surface in particular person as element of the impeachment inquiry — a go that would reveal the nameless official’s identity.
The whistleblower’s attorney, Mark Zaid, tweeted around the weekend that his consumer — whose complaint about Trump’s July cell phone simply call with the president of Ukraine touched off the impeachment probe — would offer sworn, prepared responses below penalty of perjury. Trump in switch attacked the whistleblower’s trustworthiness and demanded in-human being testimony.
“The Whistleblower gave phony info & dealt with corrupt politician Schiff. He must be introduced ahead to testify,” the president tweeted Monday early morning. “Written solutions not satisfactory! Where is the 2nd Whistleblower? He disappeared soon after I released the transcript. Does he even exist? Where is the informant? Con!”
Trump was referring to the whistleblower’s early interaction with Schiff’s employees. The whistleblower’s central allegation that Trump in July urged Ukraine to start politically linked investigations, on the other hand, has been supported by other witnesses as nicely as the contact transcript produced by the White Property.
But the president joins Residence Oversight Committee ranking member Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, in calling for the whistleblower to come forward and testify in man or woman.
Late Sunday, Jordan seemingly turned down Zaid’s offer, stating, “written answers will not present a ample possibility to probe all the suitable details and cross study the so-known as whistleblower.”
Jordan has claimed the only a person in Congress who understands the whistleblower’s identity is Dwelling Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who is top the impeachment inquiry. Zaid insists that Schiff has not individually had any get in touch with with the whistleblower or their lawful staff.
The Republican allegations about Schiff’s ties to the whistleblower stem from the revelation that in the weeks just after Trump’s July 25 telephone call with Ukrainian President Vlolodymyr Zelensky and the submitting of the whistleblower’s complaint, the whistleblower was in contact with Schiff’s staff members but unsuccessful to disclose this.
Trump has applied this as a talking position for casting question on the criticism and the ensuing impeachment inquiry that is presently checking out irrespective of whether the president pressured Ukraine into investigating his political opponents.
Existing and previous Trump administration officers have testified regarding the telephone phone and bordering situations, as Democrat-led Property committees endeavor to study far more about the context of Trump’s ask for for Zelensky to aid in the investigations of Democratic functions in the course of the 2016 election as very well as former vice president Joe Biden and his son Hunter, specially pertaining to Hunter’s enterprise dealings with Ukrainian power organization Burisma Holdings.
Zaid tweeted Sunday that he and his group have “straight engaged GOP as to the irrelevance of the whistleblower’s info and identification.”
Fox News’ Gregg Re, Chad Pergram and The Linked Push contributed to this report.